I think
the idea of “traditionalism” as brought up by Weber in chapter two is most
interesting. This concept of working only so much as to be able to live in the
ways that they are accustomed starts to enter into an anthropologic realm of
study. Weber brings up the point that “people do not wish ‘by nature’ to earn
more and more money.” This being true means that the concept of acquiring more
and more wealth is just a construction of culture. When a capitalist society
must rely on laborers from a precapitalist economy it must take into account
the economic traditionalism that the workers are comfortable with. This
reading really points out how easy it is for capitalists to find and exploit
cheap labor in non-capitalist economies. Countries with expanding populations,
the cost of labor is low, especially in tasks that require no trained skill.
The century old concept of when “lower wages were believed to enhance worker
productivity” perfectly exemplifies this willingness of capitalists to gain
wealth not only out of their commodities but also out of their laborers, as a
commodity. So depending on the economy established in a region, how exactly can
the most productive wage of labor be established?
I think too, the article “The
employees shut inside coffins” by Stephen Evans shows an example of the
long-term effects of this capitalist manipulation. The dog-eat-dog mentality of
fighting for survival arises out of societies where one worker is easily
replaced by the next, where each employer is only worth the amount of capital
that can bring to the company, sometimes, or usually meaning working longer
hours, harder, for equal pay. The
president of the coffin simulation company, Park Chun-Woong, told the BBC reporter
“he wants to strengthen the sense of corporate togetherness.” The question
becomes if the idea for this ritual was established out of an effort to better
the lives of the tirelessly over worked, or simply to reduce the rate of
suicide so as to not have to replace so many workers annually. Are these
programs such as the simulated death rituals, the forced laughter, the
stretching, that have been so said enforced “from cradle to grave” devised to
decrease the competition and distress of the at risk population, or as a simulator for better more dedicated workers?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.