We construct reality through our actions and practices. The
representation of reality also reflects
our sociocultural practices. Mintz contends that our preference for sugar is
not rooted in our biology rather our reverence for sugar is historical and closely
connected to our social practices. Mintz argues that sugar replace our desire for honey—"linguistic
imagery suggested not only the association of sweet
substance with certain sentiment, desires and moods but also the historical replacement, in large measure, of
honey by sugar" (p. 154). To buttress his argument, Mintz highlights that
language has been used to normalize and perpetuate the socially constructed
practices throughout the history; and, sugar is one of them. Sugar has become
part of our daily conversations, acts, music, poetry;
and through which our cultural imagery of sugar proliferated. For example, we
started to integrate sugar as a metaphor to describe personality and closeness
of the human relationship.
The integration of sugar in our daily lives inadvertently
began to colonize our intimate expressions. Mintz argues in contemporary English "sugared" and
"honeyed" words have been transformed
to "syrupy tones" and "sweet talking".
For example, we have naturalized the expression of sweetie/honey as a common
manifestation of our attraction and emotion. Even our everyday expressions become sugary—looking at babies, puppies or
hearing someone talking about a kind gesture makes us automatically say
"how sweet." We rarely question our
social practices and start to take them for granted. Unfortnelty, the use of sweet
talks is one of those practices that we do not question. In order to know more,
we need to delve into the historicity of sugary talks and how we integrated
sugar as part of our regime of tastes— sweet, salty, bitter, sour,
pungent, and astringent. Furthermore, we need to understand why sweet is the
dominant and/or the only taste when it comes to expressing love, affection, and
attraction.
However,
the meaning of sweet talks like any other
expressions depends on the communicative context. The sense of sugary talks can
easily be morphed into something
derogatory or negative depending on the context. Scholars like Green (2015)
argues that the expression of sugary
talks have also been continuously used
for mocking and sneering. Furthermore, the use of “sweet” in the texts,
conversations, and slang talks is very contextual and can be used both for
admiration or insult. There is often a negative connotation attached to the word “sweet talks” because it refers to
flirting. Green (2015) posits that sweet words are often used to convey a sour message. For example, there is some ironic
use of the word sweet: “sweet mess” or “take your sweet time” that taunts the person by calling them messy and slow under the
disguise of sweet words. Even we use sweet to describe a crime. A sweet crime, for example, means safe and
amendable. Moreover, the phrase “keep/have someone sweet” refers to maintain someone on your safe side, especially by complaisance or
bribery. The practice indicates the use
of the word sweet for bribery.
Though
sweet is often used to express love and affection, there has been a materiality
side to it. Green (2015) posits that what makes someone sweet is either the
gifts they bring or their sweet mouth. He states that sweet and sugar is used
interwoven in the literature; this means that what works for sweet that works
for sugar too. He also illuminates that sugar primarily means money. The terms
“big sugar” and “heavy sugar” refers to a substantial amount of money as Mintz
also points out. The documentary "Big
Sugar" sweet, white and deadly by Brian McKenna not only highlights
the “big sugar,” from it is early days with ties to slavery to modern
times with it is detrimental effects and political
relations, but also the preliminary idea
of sugar as wealth, power, and ownership.
Sugar also has used typically in English literature to pinpoint wealthy lovers. For example, “sugar daddy,” “sugar mama,” or “sugar
mummy” are used to describe the wealthy affiliates. Like sugar, the term
“candy” is also common in English spoken countries, especially the United
States. The word candy mean something admirable or desirable as well as
money. Candy’s best-known combination, which creates a precise cultural meaning, is “arm candy.” The term arm candy refers
to a charming girl that adorns the sugar daddy’s arm. The term arm candy also
works as synonymous for “eye candy” and “brain candy”, which means the person is
physically attractive but intellectually dumb (please refer to
http://blog.oup.com/2015/07/going-sour-sweet-words-slang/).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.